Democracy in Pakistan relies not just on election politics and parties but also on the efficiency and effectiveness of its parliamentary processes. The constitution of 1973 has created the Parliament, which consists of the National Assembly and Senate, as the center of lawmaking, accountability, and representation. When it comes to a state where the majority of its population comprises youth less than 30 years old, then the future of its democracy will depend on their participation in such institutions as well.
This was highlighted at the International Day of Democracy seminar organized at the Pakistan Institute of Parliamentary Services (PIPS), which was subsequently followed by visits to the National Assembly and the Senate. This piece presents a view on the point of view that to democratize Pakistan, there must be a two-pronged approach in this regard. Namely, it includes better functioning of parliaments and creation of structured pathways for youth participation in parliamentary proceedings.
Parliamentary Governance and the Role of Youth in Pakistan’s Constitutional Order
According to Article 50 of the constitution, the federal legislature consists of the bicameral Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) which includes the President, the National Assembly, and the Senate. The National Assembly, being the directly elected lower house, has power over money bills and confidence in the Prime Minister, while the Senate balances the provincial representation and acts as a stabilizing body for the federation.
The significance of this structure lies in two aspects. First, it determines the venue where the laws that impact education, employment, digital rights, and local governance are debated and passed. Second, it sets out the process through which citizens can hold the executive accountable through the process of question hour, standing committees, adjournment motion, and Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
In this sense, the participation of youth is not limited to voting alone. It encompasses involvement in the committee process, submission of inputs on policies, participation in public hearings, and use of right-to-information processes to monitor legislation and budgetary processes. This aspect was discussed in detail during the PIPS seminar, where the technical processes of parliament were discussed as a part of democracy.
Challenges to Democratic Participation and Institutional Performance
Despite a robust constitutional framework, Pakistan’s democracy faces persistent challenges that affect both institutional performance and youth engagement.
Limited Civic and Parliamentary Literacy: A lot of young people are not aware of how the Parliament works, what the committees are, and how one can interact with parliamentarians outside of the election period. From the PIPS lesson, one realizes that even the educated youth tend to confuse the National Assembly and the Senate or they simply don’t know about the tools such as parliamentary questions or submissions.
Weak Linkages Between Parliament and Citizens: Public hearings and stakeholder participation have become common practices for parliamentary committees, although they are not yet systematic and well-known to youth networks, universities, and civil society organizations. Access to bills, committee reports, and votes through digital channels has been significantly enhanced, but it is still limited and not always easy to use for laymen.
Political Instability and Trust Deficits: Change in governments, confrontation in politics, and accusations of elite capture reduce the legitimacy of the institutions that comprise a democracy. The youth could find this attitude as cynicism, disengagement, or anti-system discourse. Improving the influence that Parliament can have on people’s problems such as education, employment creation, and climate change adaptation is crucial.
Structural Barriers for Young Candidates and Voices: Although the youth form a demographic majority, there is a paucity of youth involvement at the level of party leadership, candidate nomination, and parliamentary benches. There are indeed quotas and reserved seats, but true power cannot be exercised just by numbers alone. Mentorship and policy expertise are also required.
Opportunities: Turning Constitutional Design into Democratic Practice
Pakistan’s constitutional and institutional architecture offers significant opportunities to deepen democracy through youth engagement.
Bicameralism as a Platform for Inclusive Representation: The Senate being the “House of the Federation” offers a natural starting point for incorporating the regional diversity of youth participation, even for the youth of small provinces. The establishment of Senate committees on youth, education, and technology, and the invitation of youth delegations to give testimony, will ensure that federal legislation is more informed by regional realities.
Committee System as a Space for Policy Dialogue: The standing committees that exist in both Houses already review budgets, laws, and the executive’s actions. Formalizing such youth advisory panels for the key committees, like education, information technology, and climate change, would allow youth professionals and activists to offer their research, data, and proposals to the legislator.
Digital Tools for Transparency and Engagement: The increased digitization of parliament through live streaming, websites, and document archives can be utilized to develop youth-oriented dashboards that monitor bills, committee proceedings, and the performance of MPs. Digital citizenship and open data can empower young citizens to hold governments accountable by monitoring promises, scrutinizing expenditures, and suggesting amendments.
PIPS and Parliamentary Outreach as Catalysts: The capacity building program of PIPS, which includes seminars for the Pakistan Youth Parliament, illustrates the possibilities within the process of civic education. Extending this through Parliament open days, mock committees and youth policy laboratories is an effective way to convert a single visit into regular engagement.
Recommendations: A Practical Agenda for Strengthening Democracy and Youth Participation
To move from aspiration to impact, the following evidence-based steps are proposed for Parliament, political parties, PIPS, and youth organizations.
Institutionalize Youth Advisory Mechanisms in Parliament
Formally establish Youth Advisory Panels in connection with the relevant National Assembly and Senate committees with terms of reference that require them to provide policy briefings and appear in testimony.
Ensure that committees produce an annual “Youth Input Report” that highlights all recommendations received and actions taken. This builds on existing committee practices while creating predictable channels for youth contributions.
Expand Parliamentary Literacy in Schools and Universities
Introduce a module, brief and useful, to be called “How Pakistan’s Parliament Works,” at the Higher Secondary and Undergraduate levels using PIPS material.
Propose “Parliament Clinics” within universities where students evaluate bills, write shadow reports, and present before MNAs and Senators. Such measures convert abstract civics into hands-on democratic practice.
Enhance Digital Transparency and Citizen Feedback
Create a single portal for legislation, committee schedules, minutes, and votes, along with clear descriptions and youth-friendly explanations.
Implement structured e-consultations for important laws, whereby authorized youth groups are allowed to contribute their views which must be taken into account in the committee reports. Transparent information reduces asymmetries between citizens and institutions.
Strengthen Pathways for Young Candidates and Leaders
Encourage political parties to use internal youth quotas for office and candidate selection, accompanied by mentoring and training programs.
Collaborate with PIPS and civil society organizations to conduct “Legislative Fellowships” that involve placement of young researchers and policy analysts in parliament for 6 to 12 months. This addresses the gap between demographic weight and decision-making power.
Transform the Pakistan Youth Parliament into a year-round network that convenes regional policy dialogues, produces joint position papers, and meets relevant committees twice a year.
Use PIPS’s research capacity to co-produce briefs with youth delegates on priority themes such as education reform, digital rights, and climate governance. Sustained interaction ensures that seminar learning translates into policy influence.
Conclusion
Whether democracy will take roots in Pakistan or not is going to depend much more on the working of its constitutional system than on mere sloganeering. There is a good foundation for this in the 1973 Constitution, which includes a parliamentary structure to achieve balance between the will of the people and regional balance.
PIPS seminars and parliamentary visits showed that once youths know how laws are formulated, how budgets are reviewed, and how governments can be called to account, then they start becoming stakeholders rather than spectators. Youth advisory mechanisms, increase in parliamentary literacy, greater digital transparency and avenues for youth leadership are some of the means through which Pakistan can improve its democracy. The challenge is to turn this knowledge into action—action within the Parliament, political parties, universities, and civil society—to ensure that youth involvement becomes a regular part of parliamentary politics, not a one-off process.
References:
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (1973).
National Assembly of Pakistan. (n.d.). Composition.
National Assembly of Pakistan. (n.d.). Parliament in brief. Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services.
Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services. (2026, September 16). Seminar on International Day of Democracy.
Ayyan Ahmed - Member, Pakistan Youth Parliament, Student
Loading page…